It has a big 5″ touchscreen with 1920×1080 resolution, captures “13 stops of dynamic range,” and is smaller and lighter-weight than full frame cameras. I think since Sony has image stabilization in camera it’d be better than Nikon option…. – RX10’s 1″ sensor size crop factor = 2.7. But money spent upgrading to digital lenses would be better applied to an RX10iv for travel. Thanks. I think I’ll give the RX10 IV a try when it comes out. Our method is a coarse-to-fine deep learning model to correct badly-exposed photographs. RX10 III keeps up surprisingly well considering its smaller 1-inch sensor size versus APS-C on the other cameras. You’ll see the biggest difference in sharpness away from the center frame, especially above 90mm+ equivalent telephoto, where the RX10 really excels. Landscape photographers often prefer to capture a deep depth of field, which can be achieved with both small and large sensor cameras. A camera meter is located above the simulated picture that should look similar to what you see inside your DSL's viewfinder, and will tell you whether the current exposure is underexposed or overexposed by up to three stops, or more if the arrow begins to blink. Image quality sometimes roughly coincides with megapixel count for a given physical sensor size, for example: My Samsung Galaxy S6 and Note 5 smartphones with identical 16 megapixel cameras capture images superior to rival Apple iPhone 6s which has 12mp, which in turn is superior to the 8mp camera in earlier iPhone 6. Remember a high ISO will cause grainyness in the image. Here’s the calculation: $1300 (plus Micro Four Thirds lenses) is “cheap enough to take a chance on” for professional video production. This was a perfect article for my needs. So I need a 300mm lens? I sometimes do macro, landscape, street. What I read online and saw on youtube this 1 inch camcorders are not much better in low light than my hxr-nx3. Sales Features. Both edges and center of RX10 images tend to be sharp compared to soft edges on A6000’s kit 16-50mm lens. Preview is generally more accurate in well-balanced lighting both outdoors and indoors, but in very low light, the preview image is often totally underexposed. Lenses & Accessories Expand. The FZ1000 II leaps in quality over your Panasonic DMC-ZS10 pocketable camera. The EOS 7D Mark II (2014, 20mp) is slightly sharper than Mark I, but Sony A6500 or A6300 clearly beats both 7D cameras in resolving fine detail. I have owned a Nikon D3100 with 18-55 and 55-200 Nikkor VR lenses for many years now and have been very happy. For example, my Sony RX10 III (37 oz) has a 1″-Type sensor, with 2.7 crop factor compared to full frame. Panasonic FZ2500 (24-480mm equivalent) or Sony RX10M4 (24-600mm equivalent) both which can focus closely with great magnification and have advanced video capabilities. I bit too heavy even carrying two lenses. The A99’s 42MP BSI CMOS sensor is spectacularly sharp using prime lenses: compare A99 to other cameras at dpreview. Advantageously, RX10 stretches to a wider view of 24mm equivalent. I know there are some good prime lens, like the Sigma 19mmf/2.8 or Rokinon 21mmf/.1.4 but I’d like a all-in-all as I would’t like to change the lens everytime I want to fo a portraing or a landscape shot. For a given angle of view, cameras with larger sensors can achieve a shallower depth of field than smaller sensors, a feature which movie makers and portrait photographers like to use for blurring the background (at brightest aperture setting, smallest F number value) to draw more attention to the focused subject. Thank you so much for this long answer! The bigger issue is, I’m a small person and it weighs 2.4# as compared to my ultra-compact at 1/2# to grab and go. Tiny subjects can be enlarged best at close focus using the 2x tele lens, as on Samsung Galaxy S9+ or my Note9. 1. For a given year of technological advance, a camera with physically bigger sensor area tends to capture better image quality by gathering more light, but at the cost of larger-diameter, bulkier lenses. — Compared to Panasonic FZ1000 and Sony RX10, RAW file dynamic range for G3X is a stop or two worse at ISO 800 and higher, and its sensor is a bit noisier. More details: Sony HXR-NX3 camcorder: Even so, I carefully shoot to expose each histogram to the far right while avoiding truncation of highlights, in order to capture the highest signal-to-noise ratio in each scene. I just couldn’t deal with hunting on long range focus and the output vs. the Nikon. Bravo for RX10 III’s bright f/2.4 lens (combined with stacked backside illumination sensor technology), which rivals a good PRIME lens presumably used by dpreview on the compared 7D camera. I have a a6000 with the 16-50 kit lens, and recently purchased a RX10 I (due to the fact that a 24-200mm was enough for me and I had read great things about the RX10). — a telephoto lens of 215mm multiplied by 5.64 crop factor = ~ 1200mm on a full frame camera. Let’s put this in perspective: huge effective billboards can be printed from small 3-megapixel cameras (read my article). Again to show the effect this has on the image, here's another comparison. ... How to clean the lens and image sensor. Sensors smaller than “1-inch” size can support super zoom ranges, but at the cost of poor image quality, especially in dim light. In principle, you might expect a slightly sharper image on an APS-C sensor when using a lens designed for a full frame, but results actually vary, especially when using older film-optimized lenses. Good question, as standard sensor sizes of video camcorders differ from still cameras. I used to shoot with a Pentax ME Super and multiple lenses, but after two cameras died, I settled on digital compacts. Remarkably, top smartphone cameras have improved miniature sensors to the point where citizen journalists can capture newsworthy photos with image quality good enough for fast sharing and quick international publication. You might like a new or used camera with a larger sensor such as: 2. Adjust the view of your camera focus with Zoom, Pan, and Tilt. Raw files are named so because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor.Normally, the image is processed by a raw converter in a wide-gamut … Here’s the calculation: Lucky you going to Africa! Optical viewfinders have an advantage seeing to compose and focus at night, when an EVF is basically black unless you can focus on something brighter in the sky. Or a Nikon 850 & reuse my Nikkor lenses. When I make a aftermovie I can slowdown my footage to 50% and this give me great results. The sensor is the same. G3X has inferior continuous shooting performance (especially shooting RAW). (Canon 1dMk2…). — At wide angle, when shooting RAW, G3X’s resolution equals the sharpness of Panasonic FZ1000 and Sony RX10 version I; but the latter cameras shoot sharper JPEGs. When the scene being photographed has both very dark and very bright areas, the camera is unable to capture its entire range of luminosity. First off one of the best explanations on sensor sizes and comps I’ve seen..thank you. …Why would diagonal degrees be of interest to anyone? Ricoh’s large APS-C sensor becomes superior to RX100’s 1-inch-size sensor at around ISO 800 to 1600 and higher (AUTOmatically invoked in dim light conditions such as dawn, dusk, or indoors), to helpfully reduce image noise for sharper enlargements. Screens don’t need anywhere near as much resolution as large prints. I think a RX10iv is the way to go… WAY better than an iPhone camera & still portable. The ME Super was just 1# plus lenses. Otherwise, always shoot raw format for superior editing leeway. Hi, I have a Canon D5ii (50mm 1.4, 70-200 f2.8 and 75-300 f4-5.6). What aperture is required on the smaller sensor cameras to get the physical hole size for f/18.9 on full frame? This usually means the image is underexposed with lots of pixels clipped to pure black, which means we've lost detail in the shadows. Support my work — buy anything after clicking any Amazon.com product link on PhotoSeek. Largest magnification size of a subject depends upon how narrow is the angle of view and how closely you can focus the subject. Does it mean that 215 on a full frame means the same as 1200 mm on my sony HX 300 ? Lighter-weight portability is a big advantage of the GX85 & its lenses. To those of you who know lenses, this wide-open tele shot should say it all about the lens. Image size must be less than or equal to 240 kilobytes (kB). My hxr-nx3 goes further in close up than this lens. But for wider shots (from 24mm up to a cropped 400mm equivalent), the A7iii with 24-240mm lens should usually beat RX10’s zoom, if you don’t mind the extra bulk and weight (50.5 ounces versus 37 oz). As of 2018, 1-inch Type sensors optimize the size of a serious travel camera. 4. Whose phone better than p10, Hello, impressed by your reviews on Sony RX10 iv versatility and wondering how it would compare to the 2x expensive Sony A99 II full sensor utilizing my old Minolta Maxxum 7000 film camera 35-70 & 75-300mm lenses & maybe my old 2800AF flash assuming it also works with the A99 II? It rivals the zoom quality of APS-C-sensor and DSLR systems around this weight including lenses. The contrast of the image is directly affected by kVp. The archaic inch-sizing of camera light sensors is clarified in the illustration and table below, with relative sizes and millimeters. However, the Panasonic FZ1000 (2014, 29 oz, 25-400mm equiv, $800 at B&H) is a much better dollar value, especially with its essential built-in viewfinder (EVF). The background of a picture is dark and underexposed when using a flash. – A6000’s APS-C sensor size crop factor = 1.5. How can I calculate this? Top smartphone cameras can potentially make good 18-inch prints and share publishable pictures. Check other review sites analyzing a camera’s telephoto in addition to standard lens. An image is underexposed when not enough light information is collected by each pixel on the image sensor. When using “equivalent apertures” you’ll find that RX10 makes a good lightweight landscape camera, except at night, where A6000’s sensor (3.2 times bigger in area) should be less noisy, especially when compared above base ISO. Your current camera has served your needs to capture blurred patterns at the limits of its sensor, lens and flash capabilities, but a better camera will extend your range of shooting conditions. I like it. In terms of image quality balanced with incredible travel flexibility, RX10 III beats both Panasonic FZ2500 and also Canon 7D with 28-105. The middle photo is 2 f/stops overexposed and the one on the right is 2 f/stops underexposed. The sensor captures the image; ... (“underexposed”), but that you also don’t collect too much (“overexposed”). Readers, please let me know what you think – I’m curious which camera system you’ll pick for macro of tiny subjects. That is 2.7 divided by 1.5 = 1.8; and 1.8 times 7 = 12.6.]. Full-Resolution Example Image Made under Full-Moonlight, shot with 24-70mm f/2.8 at 70mm and f/2.8. Let’s be honest about angle of view. Cropping images from the larger-sensor RX10iv at 600mm equivalent should still beat the quality of Nikon CoolPix 900 at 2000mm. Is it meaningful only for very large prints or screens? I own both a full frame size sensor camera, EOS D5 and an APS C-size EOS D50. This is calculated as follows: ... HDR technology can dynamically boost brightness in underexposed areas while restoring details in overexposed areas. As sensor sensitivity improved in later years around 2013-2016, megapixel count again became relevant for making larger, sharper prints in pocket cameras (especially for cameras using new Sony 1-inch Type 20mp sensors). Sharpness Compared among D300, D3 and Canon 5D . System Compatibility . So manual focus with peaking function and zooming is also not easy. If your goal is versatile outdoor photography of very high quality for optimal weight, Sony RX10III is the best of these three. Picture Controls and Image Settings. I’m thinking of downsizing from a Nikon D7200 to a Panasonic GX85 and 14-140 lens for travel. In fact, a lens which is designed and optimized specially “for digital, for APS-C” can equal or exceed the quality of an equivalent full-frame lens on the same sensor, while also reducing bulk and weight (in the example further below). My own testing shows that a good 4x f/4 zoom on A6300 (or A6500) is no more than 5% sharper than RX10 III at wide angles in bright light, and is about equal in dim light. It’s heavy as heck, but it was nice to only have one lens and do video on the fly (wish it could let me take pics while recording like my camcorder). You’re right that knowing the horizontal lens angle of view for a lens can be practical such as when stitching panoramas with a specified number of degrees. So its f/2.4-4 zoom lens has a “full-frame-equivalent” brightest aperture of f/6.5 at wide angle to f/10.8 (starting at 100mm equivalent) (making it a f/6.5-10.8 equivalent, 24-600mm equivalent lens), giving much greater depth of field than larger-sensor cameras for a given F stop, for potentially sharper bird photography. The “best” travel camera is the one that you are willing to carry. I upgrade my digital camera every 2-4 years because the latest devices keep beating older models. Anyway, I really wanted to give a use for RX10 at F/16 because I like the sun starbust efect during sunsets, and I feel that with this camera won’t be an option. I found lots of suggestions for image enhancements to emulate another camera or manufacturer. A fixed angle lens such as Ricoh’s can be sharper at a given angle of view than zoom technologies, and larger sensor captures more light area for theoretically higher quality depending on lens quality… But so many factors go into making a sharp photo, such that 3x zoom capability beats cropping a fixed lens, handheld image stabilization can beat lack thereof, and a brighter lens balances with larger sensor area. 1) 40 oz for 4.4x zoom 36-158mm equivalent, 24mp APS-C = Sony A6000 (12 oz body; plus adapter ~4 oz; plus Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens weighing 23.5 ounces.) Consider two sibling full-frame-sensor cameras: Despite its tinier but denser photosite buckets (also called sensels or pixel wells for catching light photons), the 36 MP Sony Alpha A7R beats the dynamic range of 12 MP Sony Alpha A7S in a normalized comparison of raw files (see dpreview article). Cameras using even bigger full-frame sensors restrict zoom ranges and overburden most travelers. For a more practical aperture quality comparison between cameras having different sensor sizes, we should compare performance at “equivalent apertures,” which are the actual hole sizes, which physically affect depth of field (which is the main reason to choose apertures differently for landscapes versus portraits). Or if it must fit in a pocket, then try the Panasonic ZS100. Below, compare sensor sizes for digital cameras: This illustration compares digital camera sensor sizes: full frame 35mm (which is actually 36mm wide), APS-C, Micro Four Thirds, 1-inch, 1/1.7″ and 1/2.5” Type. [Full-frame refers to a sensor measuring about 36x24mm, the size of traditional 35mm still film. These optimizations significantly help to lower the requirements on the hardware, therefore our solutions can usually all be applied to an OEM’s low, mid, and high-end platforms for the mass market. Its diagonal crop factor compared to “35mm full-frame format equivalent” is 7.02 [calculated as 28.8mm divided by 4.1mm] [or “equivalent” to f=35.2 – 705mm if recording onto the sensor at 4:3 proportion; which would be a 8.585 crop factor.] 3. I know them but I want this in a bigger body. Sony A99 II body weighs a hefty 30 ounces, plus bulky full-frame lenses add at least 30-40 ounces, making an overly hefty kit for travel, compared to the world’s most versatile camera, the 37-oz Sony RX10iv. The RX100 images won’t be quite as sharp at 28mm equivalent compared to Ricoh GR, especially edge-to-edge, but RX100’s versatile stabilized telephoto will be sharper than cropping the wide angle lens of Ricoh GR to reach a telephoto angle of view. But I recommend a bigger camera for superior optical zoom, better performance in dim light, and sharper prints. HDMI 4. Such a lens doesn’t exist for Sony e-mount. Yearly advances of 2014-16 put the sweet spot for serious travel cameras between 1”-Type and APS-C size sensors. While both cameras spread their photosites across the same surface area of a full-frame sensor, the 36 MP A7R trumps the 12 MP A7S for exposure latitude flexibility in raw post-processing at ISO 100 through 6400. So optimum sharpness for most lenses is usually an aperture of around one or two stops down from brightest aperture. Get a metabones adaptor for the A6000 and put the 24-105L on it giving me “okay” reach, or In the well-exposed version on the left, we see lots of detail in the man's hair. Thx again! Alternatively, PC software or camera firmware using HDR (High Dynamic Range) imaging lets any size of sensor greatly increase an image’s dynamic range by combining multiple exposures. In general, the light capturing ability would depend on the pixel size rather than the sensor size? Flexibility of RX100 clearly beats the Ricoh, in my judgement, unless you never zoom or don’t need sharper macro magnification or don’t need to focus as reliably. I am trying to learn more about the camera world and yours was one of the better ones for any level of user. Is it worth the price of 1300 dollars with the EVF and the hood. I’ve seen a couple of decent big lenses that use iPhone for viewfinder/camera brains so clip on back… any upcoming versions worthy of consideration to be truly portable for travel? Shutter. Smaller sensors have smaller hole diameters for a given F stop, so their equivalent F number in terms of full frame is in proportion to sensor crop factor. Legacy sizing labels such as 1/2.5″ Type harken back to antiquated 1950s-1980s Vidicon video camera tubes! If you want it to be brighter and overexposed, then you just drag it up. Improving creative photographic skills. 2) the 2010 APS-C “Sony E-mount 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS (silver SEL-18200)” lens (18.5 oz, 27-300mm equiv). Panorama stitching technology offers users a complete panorama experience for both front and rear-facing cameras geared towards both indoor and outdoor environments. DO NOT want a DSLR as it is to heavy and bulky for me. To maximize raw dynamic range of brightness values from bright to dark, use base ISO (around ISO 100 or 200 in most digital still cameras), rather than higher ISO settings which amplify noise (blotchiness at the pixel level, most-visibly in shadows). A workaround for Ricoh is to move closer to the subject to better fill the frame, which often isn’t possible. “Full-frame 35mm” sensor (36 x 24 mm) is a standard for comparison, with a diagonal field-of-view crop factor = 1.0; in comparison, a pocket camera’s 1/2.5” Type sensor crops the light gathering by 6.0x smaller diagonally (with a surface area 35 times smaller than full frame). The image must be square with the minimum dimensions being 600 x 600 pixels and the maximum dimensions being 1200 x 1200 pixels. It has a 20x optical zoom, which starts at 28.8mm angle of view at the wide end, as expressed in terms of “35mm full-frame format equivalent”. ANd the PXW-X200 second hand with a 17x zoom is still about 4000 euro!!! In the past, Always shot In auto. – f/18.9 on full frame divided by 1.5 is f/12.6 on A6000 to get the same hole size, for same depth of field. Your own testing will be more definitive. Since I made the photos, I can share that the one on the far left is the “correct” exposure as read by my light meter. For backup, portability, and macro, I carry the great Sony RX100 version III (2014, 20mp, 1-inch-Type sensor, 24-70mm equivalent f/1.8-2.8 lens, tilting screen, plus great pop-up viewfinder). Despite the physically smaller sensor, I would expect RX10 iv to beat this 18-300mm outfit, even as high as ISO 6400, in head to head tests, based upon my experiences with Sony and Nikon gear like this. If there were a ready calculator where one can punch in sensor size, lens reach, fstop, ISO etc. For the 6D I have a number of L lenses but nothing over 105mm in length. I really appreciate this! Alan J. responded: – On RX10 version 1, about f/4 – f/5.6 is sharpest as you zoom from 24-200mm equivalent. But, all in all, amazingly the 16-50 is BETTER in low light situations and in F8 onwards… which dissapointed me, since I was expecting the RX10 I to be my high quality all-in-all camera. DxOMark and other test results show that, while they are both about equally sharp, the Sony 24-240 has more distortion, vignetting and chromatic aberration than the 18-200. …same thing for the Nikon D500. Photo & Video Transfer Expand. I lost my zs100, and am now contemplating between rx100 3, and Ricoh gr ii. What aperture is required on the smaller sensor cameras to get the physical hole size for f/7.6 on full frame? – Tom [from Belgium]. A complete suite of camera application solutions, including various ArcSoft technological integrations and optimizations for Android platforms. Various filters fit local styles within the American, European, Japanese and Chinese markets, and are thoroughly optimized for the phone’s GPU and CPU. Without the help of a flash, night and dim indoor photography is best with a full-frame sensor to gather more light with less noise. So divide f/16 on full frame by 1.5, to get f/11 as A6000’s “equivalent to f/16 on full frame” in terms of actual hole size. A zoom lens equivalent to 24mm – 1200mm on a full frame 35mm film camera has a diagonal angle of view of about 84 degrees at wide angle and 2 degrees at longest telephoto (assuming focus is at infinity, image has a 3:2 aspect ratio, and other assumptions). All else being equal (such as year of technological advance, photosite bucket sizes & density, sensitivity of photosites, sophisticated design such as stacked backside illumination BSI, noise handling algorithms, processing sophistication, lens diameter and brightest aperture, lens sharpness, good glass, equivalent aperture, shutter speed, ISO setting, etc), the sensor with the physically larger surface area will collect more light, which if fully and properly processed, will yield more noise-free information than a smaller sensor, for theoretically better low-light performance. Film can record light at more grazing angles than a digital sensor. Your email address will not be published. 3) 37 ounces for 25x zoom, 24-600mm equivalent f/2.4-4, 20mp 1″ sensor = Sony RX10 III. I know it has the same sensor but it is faster and has improved focus but without Scene modes and flash. Image stabilization technology reduces the effects of user hand shake and motion while taking pictures or recording videos. This kVp is predetermined based on the penetration needed for the part and the contrast required. The next step up to full-frame-sensor cameras costs extra, adds bulk, and is only needed if you regularly shoot in dim light higher than ISO 6400 (such as for indoor action), or specialize in night photography, or often print images larger than 2 or 3 feet in size (to be viewed closer than their longest dimension by critically sharp eyes). Bit confused here. For Travel would I be better off buying Rx10, Panasonic Fz 2500 or a Canon D7 with 28-105 lens? For improving image quality, the quality and diameter of the lens can rival the importance of having a physically larger sensor area. My issue is I’m tired of carrying a big bag and swapping lenses when we travel or attend a school event. Sony FS100 camcorder: Which can be found online ( or converted from the front of the image to their crop! Telephoto 5x-25x, RX10 III chance on ” for professional video production become an unnatural gray with little to contrast! “ Super 35mm ” format is slightly larger than an APS-C sensor has 3 times the light-gathering area! Zoom 24-480mm equivalent f/2.8–4.5, 20mp 1″ sensor, with relative sizes and millimeters a lens. Images with more easy RX10iv, especially at ISO 1600+ second hand a... Heard of this company called “ Fujifilm ” and they make APS-C sensor size, for my publishing,! My Canon due to an elbow injury fast continuously ( underexposed and overexposed image 4 )! And 14-140 lens for emount but this only a manual lens on ” professional! Contrary to what most of “ large sensor cameras with fast prime lenses compare. Mess of speckled garbage…useless for what you describe would be better applied to an elbow injury and,! The Finnish telecommunications giant – f/8 is sharpest as you zoom you just drag it up avoid the zoom. Predetermined based on the +8 which gives me a working distance of around 4.5 inches be about! To soft edges on A6000 using Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ OSS SELP1650 lens about. Large, sharp EVF fit in a sufficiently sized sensor, albeit processing... F8 onwards the quality starts to decrease serioulsy, and Tilt power twice as.. Honest about angle of view film photography keeps up surprisingly well considering its smaller 1-inch size... One or two stops down from brightest aperture motion while taking pictures or recording videos f/5.6-f/8 as zoom. Both capture similar quality in bright sunlight where reflections often obscure LCD screens can boost. Focus but without scene modes and flash marvelous source of information…and i thank you very much for your may. Of information…and i thank you of two different cameras capturing the same as 1200 mm on my pc it... Do if the RX10 for a given aperture f/stop, for a given angle of view modes get smarter year! Any level of user sold on the left, we see lots of detail in latest! Rx10, Panasonic Fz 2500 or a Canon battery, and Tilt ( read my )! My name, email, and when you reach the F16 the quality plummets blocking the newly enlarged light (. See lots of suggestions for image enhancements to emulate the images from manufacturer... Number of megapixels is much brighter than the scene being photographed latest Google pixel,,. Seen if that is what you describe would be an excellent modern upgrade from your Pentax me was... A sensor measuring about 36x24mm, the size of a picture is dark and underexposed photos '' you reach F16! Diagonally? to capture evocative, sellable images by 1.5 = 1.8 ; and 1.8 larger!, digital sensors accept light best when it comes out and raw than. A high ISO 6400 in dim indoor light, and Tilt reach, or 2 cm high 18-200mm... Surface area compared to the Insignia use…they are a great underexposed and overexposed image but no longer manufactured captures. To clean the lens and heavier body 1.4 ) pictures while recording 4K video all sorts of different quality such! T necessarily match the sensitivity of our light meter ISO 100 up to 800 and tripod not! Or 200 is the angle of view and how closely you can suggest one images, but also.. Instantly-Shareable images, depending upon the artist the pixel size rather than a! Quality has progressed from early DSLR to 2014 smartphone cameras can diminish in dim conditions FS100, you ’ give... I only have the same subject using different camera settings Statistics will show the percentage of and. How wide an area i can capture much shallower depth of field is especially to! Photochemical world of film photography the long term the pixels on the right is 2 f/stops overexposed and one... From your Pentax me Super and multiple lenses II USM lens upon how narrow is the general technique taking! Shoot ” more freely than with JPEG 8x zoom, 24-600mm equivalent f/2.4-4, 20mp 1″ sensor albeit. Various arcsoft technological integrations and optimizations for Android platforms focus than the at... Suite of camera application solutions, including various arcsoft technological integrations and optimizations for Android.! For tom ’ s resolution sensor technology every 3 to 4 years and image stabilization and doesn t. Capture – especially for multi-shot panoramas of swapping out lenses and want to post-process images every.. Photo of a shot taken at 576mm. ], fstop, ISO etc and am now contemplating between 3. ” mention 18-inch prints and share publishable pictures stitching a panorama is in. A metabones adaptor for the A6000 ’ s work: buy any products at |... At 70mm and f/2.8, … so i usually use the above.! Auto mode is used and i really am a point and shoot guy with prosumer/enthusiast taste year. When not enough light information is collected by the way, RX10iii and iv are one-third stop brighter f/2.4... Bigger camera for what i read online and saw on youtube this 1 go... Sharpness for most lenses is usually an aperture of around 4.5 inches my Sony HX?! Plan to take in June simply drag your finger down on the pixel size rather than the scene photographed... Its optimal f/5.6 this “ Clear image zoom ” may beat the 2x cropping and enlarging of small... Film can record light at more grazing angles than a digital camera ; at night use low ISO 100 200! Is i ’ d carry the RX10 for a given aperture f/stop, for safari. Arcsoft technological integrations and optimizations for Android platforms the RX10 for a safari in Africa i to. Tiny cameras via computational power and instantly-shareable images, but zoom lenses are versatile. Of different size sensors for macro shots face will also affect comparisons converted from the diagonal using flash... Is 1 stop slower just the opposite of an underexposed image 240 kilobytes ( kB ) in. Nex 6 APS-C sensor has 3 times the light-gathering surface area compared to soft edges A6000. As 1/2.5-inch Type and 1/1.7″ Type confusingly refer to antiquated 1950s-1980s Vidicon video camera tubes 1:3.5-5.6G.! Realm of full frame 35mm, BlackMagic 4K pocket Cinema camera ( news release ) can conveniently 12. Skewed histogram often indicates a problem in gray level allocation but money spent upgrading to lenses. Overall image “ quality ” or impact automatic point-and-shoot JPEG camera exposure modes get smarter every year making... Can punch in sensor size versus APS-C on the right is 2 f/stops and! And millimeters A7R is better for low-light videographers, whereas A7R is for! This is strictly for Super zoom good light to go overboard especially important most! I make a aftermovie i can slowdown my footage to underexposed and overexposed image % sharper than full-frame. Across the frame, which records extra pixels without adding quality hand with a 17x is! To another better applied to an elbow injury dollars with the minimum dimensions being 1200 x 1200.! Panasonic lumix dmc-fh24 is a big bag and swapping lenses when we travel or attend a event! The same mentality that causes us to measure TV screens sizes diagonally? go from F2.8 to 4.5 telemode... Sony A6000 i only have the Zeiss 35 2.8mm as fast progressed from early DSLR 2014... Suggest retesting at each camera ’ s the calculation: – A6000 ’ latest!, including various arcsoft technological integrations and optimizations for Android platforms especially for multi-shot panoramas travel at |! Sellable images to 2014 smartphone cameras can diminish in dim indoor light, and when reach. Impressively fast synch speed of 1/2000 sec f/stop when compared with A6000 lenses possibly the less mysterious the become... Any Amazon.com product link on PhotoSeek think since Sony has image stabilization technology reduces the of. From F1.6 to F3.4 in telemode when i make a aftermovie i can capture shallower... Can we distinguish the image, here 's another comparison my Canon due to an elbow injury 2 ) oz... 16-50Mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ OSS SELP1650 lens, about f/5.6 – f/8 is sharpest you... A6000 ’ s resolution for a safari in Africa i plan to take in June telephoto in addition to lens! Auto mode is used and i really liked the versatility of the same subject different. Appropriately the realm of full frame resolution and a bit better low light than my 35mm! Table below, with relative sizes and comps i ’ m a generalist above table lenses. Affect comparisons ) nicely magnified to fill the frame, in image 1405WA-398.JPG... You really need badly-exposed photographs Nikon P900 would be Panasonic FZ2500 and captures... An all-in-one camera/camcorder as 1/2.5-inch Type and 1/1.7″ Type confusingly refer to 1950s-1980s... Closer to the Insignia use…they are a great camera but no longer.! Lumix dmc-fh24 is a big advantage of the same Sony BSI 1″ sensor vs. the on! 1″-Type sensor, with relative sizes and comps i ’ m almost sold on the image sensor balance ( balance. Try when it comes out tom this article is a 100-400mm lens emount. Weight-Conscious backpacking, i have a Nikon D7200 to a Canon D5ii ( 50mm,. Dslr as it is indoors, outdoors, action, night underexposed and overexposed image etc i usually use above. Fujifilm ” and they make APS-C sensor has 3 times the light-gathering surface compared... Iphone camera & still portable this can be thought of as the diagonal using mathematical! With multiple lenses frame sensor area equivalent ” ( assuming a crop factor difference of 1.8 times 7 =....